4.6 Article

Probing the conformational change of Escherichia coli undecaprenyl pyrophosphate synthase during catalysis using an inhibitor and tryptophan mutants

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 277, 期 9, 页码 7369-7376

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M110014200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Undecaprenyl pyrophosphate synthase (UPPS) catalyzes the consecutive condensation reactions of eight isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP) with farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPP) to generate C-55 undecaprenyl pyrophosphate (UPP). In the present study, site-directed mutagenesis, fluorescence quenching, and stopped-flow methods were utilized to examine the substrate binding and the protein conformational change. (S)-Farnesyl thiopyrophosphate (FsPP), a FPP analogue, was synthesized to probe the enzyme inhibition and events associated with the protein fluorescence change. This compound with a much less labile thiopyrophosphate shows K-i value of 0.2 mum in the inhibition of Escherichia coli UPPS and serves as a poor substrate, with the k(cat) value (3.1 X 10(-7) s(-1)) 10(7) times smaller than using FPP as the substrate. Reduction of protein intrinsic fluorescence was observed upon addition of FPP (or FsPP) to the UPPS solution. Moreover, fluorescence studies carried out using W91F and other mutant UPPS with Trp replaced by Phe indicate that FPP binding mainly quenches the fluorescence of Trp-91, a residue in the alpha3 helix that moves toward the active site during substrate binding. Using stopped-flow apparatus, a three-phase protein fluorescence change with time was observed by mixing the E-FPP complex with IPP in the presence of Mg2+. However, during the binding of E-FsPP with IPP, only the fastest phase was observed. These results suggest that the first phase is due to the IPP binding to E-FPP complex, and the other two slow phases are originated from the protein conformational change. The two slow phases coincide with the time course of FPP chain elongation from C-15 to C-55 and product release.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据