4.4 Article

Successful therapy for temporomandibular pain alters anterior insula and cerebellar representations of occlusion

期刊

CEPHALALGIA
卷 33, 期 15, 页码 1248-1257

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0333102413491028

关键词

Craniomandibular disorders; fMRI; chronic pain; insula; cerebellum; temporomandibular disorders; EMG; kinematography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim Craniomandibular disorders (CMD) are widespread, but we know little about the cerebral representations associated with this pain syndrome and nothing about changes in cerebral representations of occlusion induced by common therapy approaches. Methods In a longitudinal therapy study, we applied functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in 14 patients with mild CMD during occlusal movements. fMRI, pain scoring, kinematic investigations of occlusal movements, and jaw muscle electromyography (EMG) were measured before and after two weeks of therapy with an individually optimized Michigan splint. Results The patients' subjective pain ratings decreased, and the symmetry of condylar movements increased over the period of therapy. After therapy, EMG of the jaw muscles demonstrated more relaxed resting conditions and increased activity during maximal occlusion. fMRI during occlusion showed an activation decrease in the right anterior insula and right cerebellum over the course of therapy. Correlation analysis between pain score and fMRI activation decreases identified right anterior insula, left posterior insula and left cerebellar hemisphere. Left cerebellar and right primary motor activation magnitude was negatively associated with symmetry of the condylar movements. Conclusions Our findings highlight the impact of the anterior insula for the internal monitoring and the anticipation of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain. In addition, an increase of symmetry of condylar movements after therapy has been associated with a decrease of activation magnitude in primary motor and cerebellar regions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据