4.4 Article

Safety and efficacy of peripheral nerve stimulation of the occipital nerves for the management of chronic migraine: Results from a randomized, multicenter, double-blinded, controlled study

期刊

CEPHALALGIA
卷 32, 期 16, 页码 1165-1179

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0333102412462642

关键词

Chronic migraine; peripheral nerve stimulation; occipital nerve stimulation; neurostimulation; neuromodulation; headache

资金

  1. St. Jude Medical Neuromodulation Division
  2. Allergan
  3. Merck
  4. St. Jude Medical Neuromodulation
  5. Eli Lilly
  6. Pfizer
  7. Vanda
  8. Forest Research Institute
  9. Johnson and Johnson
  10. Endo Pharmaceuticals
  11. Astellas
  12. BMS
  13. SK Lifesciences
  14. OptiNose
  15. NuPathe
  16. Medtronic, Inc.
  17. Boston Scientific
  18. Bioness
  19. Greatbatch
  20. Integra
  21. BSI
  22. MESI
  23. Karger
  24. Elsevier
  25. MedaSys
  26. St. Jude Neuromodulation
  27. Spinal Modulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Chronic migraine (CM) is a debilitating neurological disorder with few treatment options. Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) of the occipital nerves is a potentially promising therapy for CM patients. Methods: In this randomized, controlled multicenter study, patients diagnosed with CM were implanted with a neurostimulation device near the occipital nerves and randomized 2: 1 to active (n = 105) or sham (n = 52) stimulation. The primary endpoint was a difference in the percentage of responders (defined as patients that achieved a >= 50% reduction in mean daily visual analog scale scores) in each group at 12 weeks. Results: There was not a significant difference in the percentage of responders in the Active compared with the Control group (95% lower confidence bound (LCB) of -0.06; p = 0.55). However, there was a significant difference in the percentage of patients that achieved a 30% reduction (p = 0.01). Importantly, compared with sham-treated patients, there were also significant differences in reduction of number of headache days (Active Group = 6.1, baseline = 22.4; Control Group = 3.0, baseline = 20.1; p = 0.008), migraine-related disability (p = 0.001) and direct reports of pain relief (p = 0.001). The most common adverse event was persistent implant site pain. Conclusion: Although this study failed to meet its primary endpoint, this is the first large-scale study of PNS of the occipital nerves in CM patients that showed significant reductions in pain, headache days, and migraine-related disability. Additional controlled studies using endpoints that have recently been identified and accepted as clinically meaningful are warranted in this highly disabled patient population with a large unmet medical need.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据