4.8 Article

Gas exchange detection of exercise-induced right-to-left shunt in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 105, 期 1, 页码 54-60

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/hc0102.101509

关键词

shunts; echocardiography; exercise; hypertension, pulmonary

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-Because of high pulmonary vascular resistance in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH), right atrial pressure may exceed left atrial pressure during exercise, resulting in a right-to-left shunt via a patent foramen ovale (PFO). This shunting would disturb arterial Pco(2) and H+ homeostasis if the pulmonary blood were not simultaneously hyperventilated. to compensate for the high CO2 and H+ in the shunted blood. This article first hypothesizes and then describes unique changes in gas exchange when right-to-left exercise-induced shunting (EIS) occurs. Methods and Results-Retrospectively, the cardiopulmonary exercise tests of 71 PPH patients were studied. Criteria postulated to document hyperventilation of the pulmonary blood flow due to a right-to-left EIS were (1) an abrupt and sustained increase in end-tidal 0, with a simultaneous sustained decrease in end-tidal CO2; (2) an abrupt and sustained increase in the respiratory exchange ratio; and (3) usually, an associated decline in pulse oximetry saturation. Each patient was evaluated for a PFO with resting echocardiography. The investigators interpreting the gas exchange evidence of EIS were blinded to the echocardiographic readings. Forty-five percent of the patients had demonstrable EIS by gas exchange criteria. Almost all were also positive for a PFO by echocardiography. Using the resting echocardiograph as the reference, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were all between 90% to 96%. Conclusions-Exercise-induced right-to-left shunting can be detected by noninvasive, cardiopalmonary exercise testing in patients with PPH.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据