4.8 Article

Functional analysis of hMLH1 variants and HNPCC-related mutations using a human expression system

期刊

GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 122, 期 1, 页码 211-219

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/gast.2002.30296

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Aims; Germline mutations in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes hMLH1 and hMSH2 are associated with susceptibility to hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). Because a significant proportion of hMLH1 mutations are missense, the assessment of their pathogenic role may be difficult. To date, functional analysis of missense mutations has been performed primarily in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The aim of this study was to examine the biochemical properties of hMLH1 protein variants in a human expression system. Methods: The HNPCC-related hMLH1 mutations T117M, V185G, R217C, G244D, R265C, V326A, and K618T, the polymorphisms I219V and R265H, and a hMLH1 splicing variant lacking exon 9 and 10 (hMLH1triangle9/10) were cloned. On transfection of these constructs into human 293T cells, which do not express hMLH1 because of promoter hypermethylation, the hMLH1 protein variants were analyzed by Western blotting and in a MMR assay. Results: Transfection was successful for all hMLH1 constructs. As anticipated, the mutations K618T and T117M, which affect the highly conserved domains of hMLH1 that are necessary for interaction with hPMS2 or for adenosine triphosphate (ATP) binding, respectively, affected protein stability or its ability to complement MMR-deficient 293T-cell extracts. The V185G, G244D, and triangle9/10 variants were also unable to complement MMR in 293T cells, whereas hMLH1 proteins carrying the I219V, R265H, R265C, R217C, and V326A mutations were MMR competent. Conclusions: These data show that the pathogenic role of hMLH1 missense mutations and splicing variants can be assessed by analyzing the biochemical properties of their protein products In a homologous expression system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据