4.7 Article

Imaging of differential protease expression in breast cancers for detection of aggressive tumor phenotypes

期刊

RADIOLOGY
卷 222, 期 3, 页码 814-818

出版社

RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2223010812

关键词

breast neoplasms, experimental studies; infrared and near-infrared spectroscopy; animals

资金

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P50CA086355] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NCI NIH HHS [P50-CA86355-01] Funding Source: Medline
  3. PHS HHS [N0I-C0M065] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE: To determine if different expression levels of tumor cathepsin-B activity in well differentiated and undifferentiated breast cancers could be revealed in vivo with optical imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A well differentiated human breast cancer (BT20, n = 8) and a highly invasive metastatic human breast cancer (DU4475, n = 8) were implanted orthotopically in athymic nude mice. Tumor-bearing animals were examined in vivo with near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging 24 hours after intravenous injection of an enzyme-sensing imaging probe. Immunohistochemistry, Western blotting (on cells and whole tumor samples), and correlative fluorescence microscopy were performed. RESULTS: Both types of breast cancers activated the NIRF probe so that tumors became readily detectable. However, in tumors of equal size, there was a 1.5-fold higher fluorescence signal in the highly invasive breast cancer (861 arbitrary units 88) compared with the well differentiated lesion (566 arbitrary units 36, P < .01). Western blotting confirmed a higher cathepsin-B protein content in the highly invasive breast cancer (DU4475) of about 1.4-fold (whole tumor samples) to 1.7-fold (cells). Immunohistochemistry and fluorescence microscopy findings confirmed the imaging findings. CONCLUSION: Cathepsin-B enzyme activity can be determined in vivo with NIRF optical imaging, while differences in tumoral expression may correlate with tumor aggressiveness. (C) RSNA, 2002.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据