4.7 Article

Characterization of Hericium erinaceum powders prepared by conventional roll milling and jet milling

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING
卷 145, 期 -, 页码 19-24

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2014.08.001

关键词

Hericium erinaceum; Particle size; Conventional roll milling; Jet milling; Physicochemical properties

资金

  1. GRRC program of the Gyeonggi province [GRRC-CAU-2012-B01]
  2. Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea [PJ907021102012]
  3. Rural Development Administration (RDA), Republic of Korea [PJ907021102012] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Four types of powder were prepared from freeze-dried fruiting bodies of the edible mushroom Hericium erinaceum by 2 different methods-conventional roll milling and the superfine grinding method of jet milling-at 3 different speeds, to compare their physicochemical properties and extraction of proteins and polysaccharides. Jet-milled powders prepared at 16,000 rpm (JMP1), 9000 rpm (JMP2), and 5000 rpm (JMP3), and roll-milled powder (RMP) had an average particle size of 5.5, 12.9, 25.2, and 243.6 mu m, respectively. The reduction of particle size resulted in increased specific surface area, porosity, and bulk density. Among the 4 powders, JMP1 showed the highest bulk density (0.17 g/ml). The water solubility index of H. erinaceum powder increased from 35.2% in RMP to 53.1% in JMP1. Similarly, the swelling capacity of JMP1, JMP2, JMP3, and RMP was 11.28 ml/g, 7.36 ml/g, 6.26 ml/g, and 5.9 ml/g, respectively. The extractions of proteins and polysaccharides from H. erinaceum powders were also improved by the application of jet milling. These results suggest that the superfine grinding method of jet milling could provide more opportunities for mushroom powders to be incorporated in a wider variety of functional food applications. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据