4.7 Article

Expression of Fc gamma RIII (CD16) on human peripheral blood eosinophils increases in allergic conditions

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 109, 期 3, 页码 463-469

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1067/mai.2002.121952

关键词

eosinophils; CD16; allergic rhinitis; asthma; hypereosinophilia; allergen challenge; IL-5 receptor; CD11b; IL-12p35

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Blood eosinophils have mRNA for FcgammaRIIIB (CD16) but no or minimal spontaneous CD16 expression. Because IFN-gamma and chemotactic factors induce eosinophil CD16 expression in vitro, we postulated that blood eosinophils could express CD16. Objective: Blood of nonallergic controls and subjects with allergic rhinitis, allergic and nonallergic asthma, or hypereosinophilia of various etiologies were analyzed for leukocyte CD16 surface expression. Methods: CD16(+) eosinophils were identified on the basis of physico-optic characteristics, major basic protein, CD49b expression, and sorting by flow cytometry and microscope examination. Results: Subjects with allergic rhinitis and subjects with asthma had higher median percentages of CD16(+) eosinophils (8.1% [1% to 48.6%] and 7.3% [1.4% to 31.1%], respectively) than nonallergic controls and nonallergic asthmatics (3% [0% to 11%] and 4.6% [2.9% to 5.1%], respectively). In subjects with hypereosinophilia, CD16(+) eosinophils were increased only in a case of drug allergy. When subjects with mild allergic asthma were challenged with a relevant aeroallergen, blood CD16(+) eosinophils further increased during or after the late-phase response (6 to 48 hours after challenge; mean +/- SEM, 9.4% +/- 2.5% to 20.0% +/- 3.0%). CD16(+) eosinophils expressed more IL-5 receptor but less CD11b and IL-12p35 than did CD16(-) eosinophils. Conclusion: Upregulation of blood CD16(+) eosinophils in allergic conditions and its association with a modified phenotype suggest that CD16 receptor could play a role in eosinophil activation in allergy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据