4.8 Article

Regulation of hepatic stellate cell proliferation and collagen synthesis by proteinase-activated receptors

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
卷 36, 期 3, 页码 362-369

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-8278(01)00285-9

关键词

hepatic stellate cell; proteinase-activated receptor; collagen; fibrosis; mast cell; tryptase; thrombin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: Thrombin and MC tryptase, which are agonists for proteinase-activated receptors-1 and -2, respectively, are both increased in injured liver. We have examined if rat stellate cells express these receptors and if receptor agonists influence stellate cell activation. Methods: Expression of mRNA for proteinase activated receptors-1 and -2 were examined by RT-PCR and Northern blotting in lysates of cultured stellate cells and receptor protein examined by Western blotting. The effects of receptor agonists on cell proliferation and collagen synthesis were examined by 3 H-thymidine and 3 H-proline incorporation assays, respectively. Results: Rat stellate cells activated by culture on plastic showed a progressive increase in expression of proteinase-activated receptor-1 and -2 mRNA and proteinase-activated receptor-2 protein as they transformed to a myofibroblastic phenotype. Proteinase-activated receptor-1 agonists thrombin and the peptide SFFLRN, and proteinase-activated receptor-2 agonists tryptase and the peptide SLIGRL induced stellate cell proliferation and the rapid phosphorylation of 44 and 42 kDa mitogen-activated protein kinases. PD98059, an inhibitor of these kinases, inhibited this proliferative response. Both tryptase and SLIGRL increased collagen secretion by stellate cells. Conclusions: This study indicates that the natural proteinase-activated receptor agonists thrombin and MC tryptase might sustain liver fibrosis by promoting stellate cell proliferation and collagen synthesis. (C) 2002 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据