4.8 Article

Contribution of the two gs-coupled PGE(2)-receptors EP2-receptor and EP4-receptor to the inhibition by PGE2 of the LPS-induced TNF alpha-information in Kupffer cells from EP2-or EP4-receptor-deficient mice. Pivotal role for the EP4-receptor in wild type Kupffer cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
卷 36, 期 3, 页码 328-334

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-8278(01)00277-X

关键词

prostanoid receptors; liver; cyclic AMP; inflammation; k. o. mouse

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: Prostaglandin E-2 (PGE(2)) is known to inhibit the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) formation in Kupffer cells via an increase in cAMP. Four receptor-subtypes have been cloned for PGE(2) so far. Two of them, the EP2-receptor and the EP4-receptor are linked to stimulatory Gs-proteins and could mediate the inhibition by PGE(2) of TNFalpha-formation. Methods: The significance of both receptors for PGE(2)-dependent inhibition of LPS-induced TNFalpha-formation was studied using Kupffer cells of mice in which either one of the two receptors had been eliminated by homologous recombination. Results: The mRNAs of both receptors were expressed in wild type mouse Kupffer cells. Exogenous PGE(2) inhibited TNFalpha-formation in Kupffer cells lacking either EP2-receptor or EP4-receptor to a similar extent as in control cells, however, 10-fold higher PGE(2) concentrations were needed for half maximal inhibition in cells lacking the EP4-receptor than in control or EP2-receptor-deficient cells. The response to endogenous PGE(2) was blunted in EP4-receptor-deficient mice only and especially after prolonged incubation. Conclusions: The data indicate, that PGE(2) can inhibit TNFalpha-formation via both the EP2- and the EP4-receptor and that, however, the EP4-receptor appears to be physiologically more relevant in Kupffer cells since it conferred a high affinity response to PGE(2). (C) 2002 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据