4.6 Review

Interactions between the heat shock response and the nuclear factor-kappa B signaling pathway

期刊

CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
卷 30, 期 1, 页码 S89-S95

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200201001-00012

关键词

stress response; heat shock; signal transduction; inflammation; nuclear factor-kappa B; I kappa B alpha; heat shock factor; kinase; phosphatase; pharmacologic inhibitors

资金

  1. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [K08HL003725] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM061723, T32GM008478] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The heat shock response (HSR) and the nuclear factor (NF)-kappaB signaling pathway are two fundamental cellular responses. Various laboratories have documented in vitro and in vivo interactions between the HSR and NF-kappaB activation when they are activated sequentially. For example, induction of the HSR before a proinflammatory signal inhibits NF-kappaB activation and NF-kappaB-dependent proinflammatory gene expression. The central point of control appears to be at the level of IkappaBalpha phosphorylation as demonstrated by HSR-mediated inhibition of IkappaB kinase activation and HSR-mediated induction of intracellular phosphatase activity. In addition, induction of the HSR can independently increase de novo expression of the IkappaBalpha gone, thereby providing another potential mechanism through which the HSR can modulate cellular proinflammatory signaling. Another level of interaction is illustrated by the observation that various pharmacologic inhibitors of the NF-kappaB pathway are capable of simultaneously inducing the HSR. In direct contrast, induction of the HSR after a proinflammatory signal can lead to programmed cell death. Further understanding of how these two fundamental cellular responses interact at the molecular level holds the potential to elucidate some of the molecular interactions that occur during disease states common to critical care medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据