4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Cyproterone acetate versus a continuous monophasic oral contraceptive in the treatment of recurrent pelvic pain after conservative surgery for symptomatic endometriosis

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 77, 期 1, 页码 52-61

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)02951-X

关键词

endometriosis; dysmenorrhea; deep dyspareunia; pelvic pain; progestin; oral contraceptive; conservative pelvic surgery; quality of life

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cyproterone acetate versus an oral contraceptive in the treatment of endometriosis-associated recurrent pelvic pain. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Academic center. Patient(s): Ninety women with recurrent moderate or severe pelvic pain after conservative surgery for symptomatic endometriosis. Intervention(s): Six months of continuous treatment with oral cyproterone acetate, 12.5 mg/d, or an oral contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol, 0.02 mg, and desogestrel, 0.15 mg. Main Outcome Measure(s): Degree of satisfaction with therapy. Result(s): Six patients in the cyproterone acetate arm and nine in the oral contraceptive arm withdrew because of side effects (n = 9), treatment inefficacy (n = 4), or loss to follow-up (n = 2). At 6 months, dysmenorrhea, deep dyspareunia. and nonmenstrual pelvic pain scores were substantially reduced, and significant improvements were observed in health-related quality-of-life, psychiatric profile, and sexual satisfaction: no major between-group differences were seen. Subjective and metabolic side effects were limited. According to an intention-to-treat analysis, 33 of 45 (73%) of patients in the cyproterone acetate group and 30 of 45 (67%) in the oral contraceptive group were satisfied with the treatment received. Conclusions: Both cyproterone acetate and a continuous monophasic oral contraceptive were effective, safe, and inexpensive therapy for recurrent pain after conservative surgery for endometriosis. (Fertil Steril(R) 2002; 77:52-61. (C) 2002 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据