4.6 Article

Canola (Brassica napus) oil from Australian cultivars shows promising levels of tocopherols and carotenoids, along with good oxidative stability

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD COMPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
卷 42, 期 -, 页码 179-186

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2015.03.010

关键词

Food analysis; Food composition; Rapeseed; Vitamin E; Tocopherols; Carotenoids; Bioactive compounds; Biodiversity and nutrition

资金

  1. Graham Centre
  2. Grains Research and Development Corporation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A total of 156 commercial canola seed samples were collected from two growing seasons and tested for oil and protein content, glucosinolate concentration and kernel weight. Extracted oil samples were tested for the bioactive compounds: beta-carotene (mean = 2.03 mg/kg), lutein (64.7), alpha-tocopherol (263), gamma-tocopherol (378) and delta-tocopherol (8.94). A subset of 52 oil samples were analyzed for fatty acid profile (FAP) and oxidative stability. Canola cultivar was found to be the dominant influence on many traits, particularly carotenoids and tocopherols, indicating potential breeding opportunities. Previously unreported significant correlations were discovered between the two major carotenoids, lutein and beta-carotene. Additionally, significant (p < 0.01) negative correlations existed between oil content and: beta-carotene (r = -0.33), lutein (r = -0.23), alpha-tocopherol (r = -0.49), gamma-tocopherol (r = -0.22), and delta-tocopherol (r = -0.30). Polyunsaturated fatty acid content was significantly (p < 0.01) positively correlated with carotenoid (r = 0.48) and tocopherol (r = 0.60) concentrations. Oxidative stability showed a weak negative correlation with total tocopherols (r = -0.38, p = 0.01) likely due to the overriding influence of fatty acid profile on oxidative stability, indicating tocopherols may be more influential from a nutritional perspective rather than oil functionality. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据