4.7 Article

Advances in alternative cementitious binders

期刊

CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH
卷 41, 期 12, 页码 1232-1243

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.11.012

关键词

Hydration; Alkali-activated cement; Calcium aluminate cement; Sulfoaluminate; Granulated blast furnace slag

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [OISE-0757284, CMS-0510854, CMMI-0448983, CMMI-0926627]
  2. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Mapei
  3. BASF
  4. Tennessee Technological University (TTU) Center for Manufacturing Research (CMR)
  5. Canadian Research Center on Concrete Infrastructure (CRIB)
  6. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERCC)
  7. Swiss Federal Innovation Promotion Agency CTI [9623.1 PFIW-IW]
  8. Australian Research Council
  9. Kerneos Aluminate Technologies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is a burgeoning interest in the development, characterization, and implementation of alternatives to Portland cement as a binder in concrete. The construction materials industry is under increasing pressure to reduce the energy used in production of Portland cement clinker and the associated greenhouse gas emissions. Further, Portland cement is not the ideal binder for all construction applications, as it suffers from durability problems in particularly aggressive environments. Several alternative binders have been available for almost as long as Portland cement, yet have not been extensively used, and new ones are being developed. In this paper, four promising binders available as alternatives to Portland cement are discussed, namely calcium aluminate cement, calcium sulfoaluminate cement, alkali-activated binders, and supersulfated cements. The history of the binders, their compositions and reaction mechanisms, benefits and drawbacks, unanswered questions, and primary challenges are described. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据