4.4 Article

Comparison of inflammation, organ damage, and oxidant stress induced by Salmonella enterica serovar Muenchen flagellin and serovar Enteritidis lipopolysaccharide

期刊

INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
卷 70, 期 1, 页码 192-198

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.70.1.192-198.2002

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [R29GM54773, R01GM57407] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R29GM054773, R01GM057407] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gram-negative sepsis is related to the activation of interconnected inflammatory cascades in response to bacteria and their products. Recent work showed that flagellin, the monomeric subunit of bacterial flagella, triggers innate immune responses mediated by Toll-like receptor 5. Here, we compared the effects of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and recombinant Salmonella enterica serovar Muenchen flagellin administered intravenously (100 mug) to mice. Flagellin and LPS both elicited a prototypical systemic inflammatory response, with increased levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha, gamma interferon, interleukin 6 and 10, and nitrate in plasma. Flagellin induced a widespread oxidative stress, evidenced by an increase in malondialdehyde and a decrease in reduced glutathione in most organs, as well as liver (increased plasma aminotransferases), but not renal, injury. Alternatively, LPS resulted in a less severe oxidative stress and triggered renal, but not liver, damage. Sequestration of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (increased myeloperoxidase activity) in the lungs was observed with both toxins, while only LPS recruited neutrophils in the gut. In additional experiments, the simultaneous administration of small doses of LPS and flagellin (10 mug) induced a synergistic enhancement of the production of proinflammatory cytokines. Our data support a novel concept implicating flagellin as a mediator of systemic inflammation, oxidant stress, and organ damage induced by gram-negative bacteria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据