4.7 Article

Highly concentrated carbon nanotube admixture for nano-fiber reinforced cementitious materials

期刊

CEMENT & CONCRETE COMPOSITES
卷 34, 期 5, 页码 612-617

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.01.006

关键词

Carbon nanotubes; Ultracentrifugation; Mechanical properties; Optical absorbance spectroscopy; Nano composites

资金

  1. Infrastructure Technology Institute at Northwestern University [DTRT06-G-0015/M1]
  2. US National Science Foundation [DMR-1006391]
  3. Division Of Materials Research
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1006391] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of effectively dispersed multiwalled carbon nanotube (MWCNT)/aqueous/surfactant suspensions in cement based materials have been shown to substantially improve their mechanical properties. The produced MWCNT suspensions have a high aqueous content, which corresponds to the mixing water. In the present work, a method for preparing highly concentrated MWCNT suspensions is presented, thus reducing the volume of the resulting admixture that is required in cement based materials. A centrifugal process, that uses two different ultracentrifuge rotors, was employed to reduce the quantity of water in the suspensions. Optical absorbance spectroscopy shows that the ultracentrifugation process increases the concentration of the MWCNT suspensions by a factor of 5. Using the highly concentrated MWCNT suspensions following dilution results in nanocomposites with mechanical properties that are comparable to the performance of samples prepared using the non-concentrated suspensions. These results verify that the ultracentrifugation concentration method successfully preserves the solubility of the MWCNT suspensions without affecting the reinforcing properties of the admixture. In this manner, the ultracentrifugation concentration method may constitute an effective preparation step for large-scale implementation of MWCNT admixtures. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据