4.7 Article

A multi-phase kinetic model to simulate hydration of slag-cement blends

期刊

CEMENT & CONCRETE COMPOSITES
卷 32, 期 6, 页码 468-477

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.03.006

关键词

Slag reaction; Cement hydration; Blended cement; Simulation

资金

  1. Ministry of Education and Science Technology, Sustainable Building Research Center, Hanyang University [R11-2005-056-04003]
  2. Ministry of Land, Transport and Marine Affairs [06-CIT-A02]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [과C6A1705, 2005-0049734] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ground granulated blast furnace slag, which shows cementitious behavior (latent hydraulic activity) and pozzolanic characteristics (reaction with lime), has been widely used as a mineral admixture in normal and high strength concretes. Hydration of slag-blended cement is much more complex than that of ordinary Portland cement because of the mutual interactions between the cement hydration and the slag reaction. This paper presents a kinetic hydration model for cement-slag blends. The proposed model analyzes the slag reaction separate from cement hydration by considering the production of calcium hydroxide in cement hydration and its consumption in slag reactions. The amount of free water and the amount of calcium hydroxide left in the system were adopted as the control indicators for determining the slag reaction. Using the proposed model, the reaction ratio of slag can be evaluated as a function of curing age, considering the influences of the water to binder ratio, the slag replacement ratio and the curing temperature. Furthermore, the amount of chemically-bound water (self-cementing properties), calcium hydroxide (pozzolanic capabilities), and the heat released from hydration are evaluated by determining the contributions from both the cement hydration and the slag reaction. The evaluated results show good accordance with the experimental results. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据