4.7 Article

Intensive lifestyle changes are necessary to improve insulin sensitivity - A randomized controlled trial

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 445-452

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/diacare.25.3.445

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective-The extent to which lifestyle must be altered to improve insulin sensitivity has not been established. This study compares the effect on insulin sensitivity of current dietary and exercise recommendations with a more intensive intervention in normoglycemic insulin-resistant individuals. Research design and methods-Seventy-nine normoglycemic insulin-resistant (determined by the euglycemic insulin clamp) men and women were randomized to either a control group or one of two combined dietary and exercise programs, One group (modest level) was based on current recommendations and the other on a more intensive dietary and exercise program. Insulin sensitivity as measured using a euglycemic insulin clamp, body composition was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and anthropometry and aerobic fitness were assessed before and after a 4-month intervention period. Four-day dietary intakes were recorded, and lasting glucose, insulin, and lipids were measured. Results-only the intensive group showed a significant improvement in insulin sensitivity (23% increase, P=0.006 vs 9% in the modest group, P=0.23). This was associated with a significant improvement in aerobic fitness (11% increase in the intensive group, P=0.02 vs. 1% in the modest group, P=0.94) and a greater fiber intake, but no difference in reported total or saturated dietary fat. Conclusions-Current clinical dietary and exercise recommendations, even when vigorously implemented, did not significantly improve insulin sensitivity however, a more intensive program did. Improved aerobic fitness appeared to be the major difference between the two intervention groups, although weight loss and diet composition may have also played an important role in determining insulin sensitivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据