4.7 Article

The effects of two biocompatible plasticizers on the performance of dry bacterial cellulose membrane: a comparative study

期刊

CELLULOSE
卷 25, 期 10, 页码 5893-5908

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-018-1968-z

关键词

Bacterial cellulose; Dry membrane; Plasticizer; Glycerol; Polyethylene glycol

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51473019, 51773018]
  2. Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Plan Projects [Z161100000116003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacterial cellulose (BC) has unique properties and is widely applied as wound dressings. Dry BC membranes have better stability and longer storage time, but are poor in gas permeability and water absorption. To solve the problems with dry BC, we prepared two different plasticized dry BC membranes using two biocompatible plasticizers with different molecular weight and hydroxyl content, namely glycerol (G) and polyethylene glycol (PEG). The different effects of the two plasticizers on the structure and performance of dry BC were systematically compared and analyzed. The plasticized dry BC membranes were characterized with Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, thermo-gravimetry, etc. The elongation at break for BC/2%G and BC/2%PEG were 8.1 and 12.5 times that of dry BC, respectively. BC/2%G had a water absorption of 4560%, and a water retention rate of 2468%, and those for BC/2%PEG were 4690% and 1972%, respectively. The highly porous structure of the plasticized dry BC membranes effectively enhanced the water vapor transmission rate of the membranes. The different effects of the two plasticizers can be ascribed to the differences in molecule size, hydroxyl content, hydrogen bond interaction, etc. The plasticized dry BC membranes showed excellent resistance to bacteria, which were 99.8% for BC/G and 99.9% for BC/PEG. The performance of the two plasticized dry BC membranes can be tuned to adapt to different applications. [GRAPHICS] .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据