4.7 Article

Short cellulose nanofibrils as reinforcement in polyvinyl alcohol fiber

期刊

CELLULOSE
卷 21, 期 6, 页码 4287-4298

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-014-0411-3

关键词

Short cellulose nanofibrils; Gel spinning; Polyvinyl alcohol; Nanocomposites; Stress transfer; Crystal orientation

资金

  1. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Award [2011-67009-20056]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [51073601, 21174044]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2011ZZ0011]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2012M511791]
  5. 973 Program [2012CB025902]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Short cellulose nanofibrils (SCNF) were investigated as reinforcement for polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) fibers. SCNF were mechanically isolated from hard wood pulp after enzymatic pretreatment. Various levels of SCNF were added to an aqueous PVA solution, which was gel-spun into continuous fibers. The molecular orientation of PVA was affected by a combination of wet drawing during gel spinning and post-hot-drawing at a high temperature after drying. A maximum total draw ratio of 27 was achieved with various SCNF contents investigated. The PVA crystal orientation increased when small amounts of SCNF were added, but decreased again as the SCNF content was increased above about 2 or 3 %, likely due to SCNF percolation resulting in network formation that inhibited alignment. SCNF fillers were effective in improving PVA fiber tensile properties (i.e., ultimate strength and elastic modulus). For example, the ultimate strength and modulus of PVA/SCNF composite fiber with a SCNF weight ratio of 6 were nearly 60 and 220 % higher than that of neat PVA. Shifts in the Raman peak at similar to 1,095 cm(-1), which were associated with the C-O-C glycosidic bond of SCNF, indicated good stress-transfer between the SCNF and the PVA matrix due to strong interfacial hydrogen bonding. Cryogenic fractured scanning electron microscopy images of filled and unfilled PVA fibers showed uniform SCNF dispersion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据