4.7 Article

Surface modification of cellulose microfibrils by periodate oxidation and subsequent reductive amination with benzylamine: a topochemical study

期刊

CELLULOSE
卷 21, 期 6, 页码 4119-4133

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-014-0459-0

关键词

Cellulose microfibrils; Surface modification; Topochemistry; Hemiacetal cyclization; Periodate oxidation; C-13 CP-MAS solid-state NMR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Never-dried sulfite wood pulp was beaten and subsequently microfibrillated before being submitted to periodate oxidation for various times. The oxidation progress, which was followed by C-13 solid-state NMR spectroscopy in conjunction with degree of oxidation (DO) measurements together with ultrastructural observations, revealed that the cellulose crystallinity and microfibrillar integrity were kept intact until a DO of 0.3/0.4, indicating that at that level, the cellulose microfibrils had been oxidized exclusively at their surface. Beyond this DO value, the sample crystallinity started to deteriorate, as the oxidation progressed toward the core of the microfibrils. Remarkably, throughout the oxidation, the created carbonyl moieties were never observed, as they were readily recombined into hemiacetals by cyclization either within the same anhydro glucose unit (AGU) or with the adjacent un-oxidized AGUs of the same cellulose chain. At DO below 0.3/0.4, hemiacetal coupling with adjacent cellulose chains was also considered, but it appeared unlikely in view of the interchain distance imposed by the crystalline lattice. The oxidized samples were subjected to a reductive amination with benzylamine in order to convert their hydrophilic surfaces into hydrophobic ones. Despite the ease of this derivatization, the analysis of the C-13 solid-state NMR spectra of the aminated products showed that, below a DO of 0.3, only half of the hemiacetal moieties could be converted into secondary amine products, whereas the other half remained untouched, likely for steric reasons.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据