4.5 Article

OmpR-dependent and OmpR-independent responses of Escherichia coli to sublethal attack by the neutrophil bactericidal/permeability increasing protein

期刊

MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY
卷 43, 期 6, 页码 1493-1504

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02804.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK005472, R37DK005472] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK05472] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein (BPI) of neutrophils is a lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-binding antibacterial protein with specificity for Gram-negative bacteria. BPI binding to the bacterial surface rapidly triggers potentially reversible bacterial growth inhibition and alterations of the outer membrane and, later, disruption of the inner membrane and lethal injury. Initial effects include selective OmpR-dependent changes in the synthesis of outer membrane porins (OmpF and OmpC). Because OmpR is a global transcriptional regulator, we have examined its possible role in responses of E. coli to sublethal injury caused by BPI. Early (<15 min) reversible effects of BPI on bacterial colony-forming ability and outer membrane permeability were virtually identical in isogenic wild-type (wt) and ompR- E. coli. Both strains could repair the outer membrane permeability barrier after Mg2+-induced displacement of bound BPI. However, OmpR was essential for the ability of E. coli to tolerate low doses of BPI and escape the progression of sublethal to lethal damage. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that BPI treatment produced greater membrane perturbations in the ompR- strain, apparent even before lethal injury. These findings suggest that the fate of E. coli exposed to BPI depends on both OmpR-independent mechanisms engaged in outer membrane repair and OmpR-dependent processes that modulate porin synthesis and retard progression of injury from the outer to the inner membrane.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据