4.7 Article

Ozone fluxes above and within a pine forest canopy in dry and wet conditions

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
卷 36, 期 1, 页码 77-88

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00468-X

关键词

atmosphere-biosphere exchange; trace gas flux; eddy covariance; ozone dry deposition; understorey; surface wetness

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The physiological and physical processes controlling ozone dry deposition to vegetated surfaces are still not fully understood. In particular, the role of the understorey and the possible action of dew on ozone deposition have not received much attention so far. This paper presents the results of an experiment aimed at quantifying ozone dry deposition to a maritime pine forest in the Les Landes area in France. Ozone deposition fluxes were measured using the eddy-covariance technique above and within the canopy. We investigate the factors acting on ozone deposition in both dew-wetted and dry conditions. The values obtained for the ozone deposition velocity are well in the range of previously published measurements over coniferous forests. For the present forest. ozone uptake by the understorey is a significant portion of ozone deposition to the whole pine stand. The understorey contributes more to the overall ozone flux than to the other measured scalar fluxes (sensible heat and water vapour). During dry nights the surface conductance for ozone and the friction velocity are strongly correlated, showing that ozone deposition is largely controlled by dynamical processes. During the day, in dry conditions, the canopy stomatal conductance is the major parameter controlling ozone deposition. However, in winter, when the stomata] conductance is low, the influence of dynamical processes persists during day-time. It is also found that surface wetness associated with dew significantly enhances ozone deposition, during the night as well as in the morning. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据