4.6 Article

Extrinsic sphingosine 1-phosphate activates S1P5 and induces autophagy through generating endoplasmic reticulum stress in human prostate cancer PC-3 cells

期刊

CELLULAR SIGNALLING
卷 26, 期 3, 页码 611-618

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2013.11.024

关键词

Sphingosine 1-phosphate; ER stress; Autophagy; Prostate cancer

资金

  1. National Science Council, Taiwan [NSC 100-2325-B-002-045, NSC 102-2311-B002-036, NSC 102-2320-B-468-001]
  2. National Heath Research Institutes, Taiwan [NHRI 101-EX101-10130BI]
  3. National Taiwan University [NTU 102R76263A]
  4. Asia University [100-asia-12, 101-asia-38]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sphingosine 1-phosphate (SIP) is a bioactive lysophospholipid that binds to a family of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), termed S1P(1)-S1P(5). Our previous study has reported that SIP induces autophagy in human prostate cancer PC-3 cell. In addition, SIP-induced autophagy plays a prosurvival role in PC-3 cells. Accumulating evidence has shown that the autophagy responses triggered by ER stress signaling have cytoprotective effects. Thus, we attempted to investigate whether SI P-induced autophagy is a result of triggering ER stress in PC-3 cells. By monitoring XBP-1 mRNA splicing, a characteristic of ER stress, we demonstrate that S1P triggers ER stress in a concentration-dependent and time-dependent manner. Moreover, DiH SIP, a membrane-nonpermeable SIP analog without intracellular effects also enhances ER stress. Meanwhile, we also show that S1P(5) is required for S1P-induced ER stress by using RNA interference experiments. Furthermore, signaling analyses revealed that PI3K, PLC, and ROS production were involved in S1P's effects on ER stress induction. On the other hand, knockdown of XBP-1 abolished SIP-induced autophagy. In summary, our results demonstrate for the first time that the extracellular S1P-triggered ER stress is responsible for autophagy induction in PC-3 cells. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据