4.6 Article

Increased activity of mitogen activated protein kinase pathway in flotillin-2 knockout mouse model

期刊

CELLULAR SIGNALLING
卷 26, 期 2, 页码 198-207

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2013.11.001

关键词

Cell signaling; Gene transcription; MAP kinases; p53; Signal transduction; Extracellularly regulated kinase

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Ti291/6-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flotillins are highly conserved and widely spread proteins that function in receptor tyrosine kinase signaling and membrane trafficking processes. Flotillin-1 and flotillin-2 have been shown to form both homo- and hetero-oligomers, and their cellular localization changes during signaling. Increased expression of flotillins has been detected in several types of cancer and shown to correlate with poor survival. Consistently, flotillin-2 knockout mice show a reduced formation of metastases in a breast cancer animal model. Our recent data have shown that flotillin-1 depletion results in diminished activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor and impairs its downstream signaling towards the mitogen activated protein kinases and the respective transcriptional response. Here we show that genetic ablation of flotillin-2 in a mouse model or its knockdown in cultured cells increases extracellular signal regulated kinase (ERR) activation. Furthermore, the downstream transcriptional targets of ERK and p53 are upregulated at both mRNA and protein levels. These data suggest that opposite effects are obtained upon ablation of one of the two flotillins, with flotillin-2 knockout/knockdown enhancing and flotillin-1 knockdown inhibiting ERR signaling. Due to their overexpression in cancers, flotillins may be considered as cancer therapy targets. However, our findings suggest that care needs to be taken when interfering with flotillin function, as undesired effects such as deregulation of growth-associated genes may emerge in certain cell types. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据