4.6 Article

Transforming growth factor β induces expression of connective tissue growth factor in hepatic progenitor cells through Smad independent signaling

期刊

CELLULAR SIGNALLING
卷 25, 期 10, 页码 1981-1992

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2013.05.027

关键词

Transforming growth factor beta; Hepatic progenitor cells; Connective tissue growth factor; Intracrine signaling; Smad-independent signaling

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [30973498, 81072001]
  2. State Key Project on Infection Disease of China [2012ZX10002016-004, 2012ZX10002010-001-004]
  3. Chinese Ministry of Public Health for Key Clinical Project [[2010] 493-51]
  4. Graduate Innovation Fund of Graduate Practice Base of Innovation and Enterprise, Huazhong University of Science and Technology [HF-09-34-2011-540]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hepatic progenitor cells (HPCs) are activated in the chronic liver injury and are found to participate in the progression of liver fibrosis, while the precise role of HPCs in liver fibrosis remains largely elusive. In this study, by immunostaining of human liver sections, we confirmed that HPCs were activated in the cirrhotic liver and secreted transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) and connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), both of which were important inducers of liver fibrosis. Besides, we used HPC cell lines LE/6 and WB-F344 as in vitro models and found that TGF-beta induced secretion of CTGF in HPCs. Moreover, TGF-beta signaling was intracrine activated and contributed to autonomous secretion of CTGF in HPCs. Furthermore, we found that TGF-beta induced expression of CTGF was not mediated by TGF-beta activated Smad signaling but mediated by TGF-beta activated Erk, JNK and p38 MAPK signaling. Taken together, our results provide evidence for the role of HPCs in liver fibrosis and suggest that the production of CTGF by TGF-beta activated MAPK signaling in HPCs may be a therapeutic target of liver fibrosis. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据