4.5 Review

Glucose metabolism in the amygdala in depression: Relationship to diagnostic subtype and plasma cortisol levels

期刊

PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR
卷 71, 期 3, 页码 431-447

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0091-3057(01)00687-6

关键词

positron emission tomography; major depression; bipolar disorder; amygdala; cortisol

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R29MH051137, K20MH000928, Z01MH002792] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [MH 01109, MH00928, MH51137] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In a previous positron emission tomography (PET) study of major depression, we demonstrated that cerebral blood flow was increased in the left amygdala, in unipolar depressives with familial pure depressive disease (FPDD) relative to healthy controls [J. Neurosci. 12 (1992) 3628.]. These measures were obtained from relatively low-resolution PET images using a stereotaxic method based upon skull X-ray landmarks. The current experiments aimed to replicate and extend these results using higher-resolution glucose metabolism images and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based region-of-interest (ROI) analysis. The specificity of this finding to FPDD was also investigated by assessing depressed samples with bipolar disorder (BD-D) and depression spectrum disease (DSD). Finally, the relationship between amygdala metabolism and plasma cortisol levels obtained during the scanning procedure was assessed. Glucose metabolism was measured using PET and F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)FDG) in healthy control (n = 12), FPDD (n = 12), DSD (n = 9) and BD-D (n = 7) samples in the amygdala and the adjacent hippocampus. The left amygdala metabolism differed across groups (P<.001), being increased in both the FPDD and BD-D groups relative to the control group. The left amygdala metabolism was positively correlated with stressed plasma cortisol levels in both the unipolar (r =.69; P<,005) and the bipolar depressives (r = 0.68;. 1

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据