4.6 Article

MCPIP1 negatively regulates toll-like receptor 4 signaling and protects mice from LPS-induced septic shock

期刊

CELLULAR SIGNALLING
卷 25, 期 5, 页码 1228-1234

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2013.02.009

关键词

MCPIP1; Toll-like receptor; LPS; Septic shock; TNF

资金

  1. National Institute of Health [HL098794, CA163808, CA137126, HL097218, HL076206, HL068878, HL089544]
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA163808, K22CA137126] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R21HL098794, R01HL076206, R01HL068878, R21HL097218, R01HL089544] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Septic shock is one of leading causes of morbidity and mortality in hospital patients. However, genetic factors predisposing to septic shock are not fully understood. Our previous work showed that MCP-induced protein 1 (MCPIP1) was induced by lipopolysaccharides (LPSs), which then negatively regulates LPS-induced inflammatory signaling in vitro. Here we report that although MCPIP1 was induced by various toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands in macrophages, MCPIP1-deficient mice are extremely susceptible to TLR4 ligand (LPS)-induced septic shock and death, but not to the TLR2, 3, 5 and 9 ligands-induced septic shock. Consistently, LPS induced tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha) production in MCPIP1-deficient mice was 20-fold greater than that in their wild-type littermates. Further analysis revealed that MCPIP1-deficient mice developed severe acute lung injury after LPS injection and JNK signaling was highly activated in MCPIP1-deficient lungs after LPS stimulation. Finally, macrophage-specific MCPIP1 transgenic mice were partially protected from LPS-induced septic shock, suggesting that inflammatory cytokines from sources other than macrophages may significantly contribute to the pathogenesis of LPS-induced septic shock Taken together, these results suggest that MCPIP1 selectively suppresses TLR4 signaling pathway and protects mice from LPS-induced septic shock. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据