4.6 Article

Fundus autofluorescence in patients with age-related macular degeneration and high risk of visual loss

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 133, 期 3, 页码 341-349

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9394(01)01404-0

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To describe fundus autofluorescence (AF) patterns and their change over time in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and high risk of visual loss participating in the drusen laser study (DLS). Design: Randomized clinical trial. Methods: The study population consisted of 29 patients (35 eyes) participating in the DLS, which is a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial of prophylactic laser therapy in patients with AMD and high risk of neovascular complications. The intervention consisted of 16 eyes having prophylactic laser and 19 receiving no treatment. The main outcome measures were changes in the distribution of drusen and AF. Patients were reviewed for a median follow-up or 24 months (range 12-36 months). Results: At baseline, four patterns of fundus AF were recognized: focal increased AF (n=18), reticular AF (n=3), combined focal and reticular AF (n=2), and homogeneous AF (n=12). At last follow-up, fundus AF remained unchanged in 15 untreated (78%) and in seven treated (43%) eyes. In only one untreated eye, focal areas of increased AF returned to background levels and were no longer detectable at last follow,up, compared with six treated eyes. This difference was statistically significant (P=.03). Only large foveal soft drusen (drusenoid pigment epithelium detachments) consistently corresponded with focal changes in AF, whereas no obvious correspondence was found between small soft drusen located elsewhere and changes in AF. Conclusion: The lack of obvious correspondence between the distribution of drusen and of AF found in this study appears to indicate that drusen and AF represent independent measures of aging in the posterior pole. (Am J Ophthalmol 2002;133:341-349. (C) 2002 by Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据