4.6 Review

Redox signaling loops in the unfolded protein response

期刊

CELLULAR SIGNALLING
卷 24, 期 8, 页码 1548-1555

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2012.03.011

关键词

ER stress; Unfolded protein response; Protein disulfide isomerase; ER homeostasis

资金

  1. Inserm (Avenir)
  2. Institut National du Cancer (Inca)
  3. Ligue Contre le Cancer
  4. Association de Recherche sur le Cancer (ARC)
  5. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicate (FRM)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is the first compartment of secretory pathway. It plays a major role in ER chaperone-assisted folding and quality control, including post-translational modification such as disulfide bond formation of newly synthesized secretory proteins. Protein folding and assembly takes place in the ER, where redox conditions are distinctively different from the other organelles and are favorable for disulfide formation. These reactions generate the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) as a byproduct of thiol/disulfide exchange reaction among ER oxidoreductin 1 (Ero1), protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) and ER client proteins, during the formation of disulfide bonds in nascent or incorrectly folded proteins. When uncontrolled, this phenomenon perturbs ER homeostasis, thus aggravating the accumulation of improperly folded or unfolded proteins in this compartment (ER stress). This results in the activation of an adaptive mechanism named the unfolded protein response (UPR). In mammalian cells, the UPR is mediated by three ER-resident membrane proteins (PERK, IRE1 and ATF6) and regulates the expression of the UPR target genes, which themselves encode ER chaperones, folding enzymes, pro-apoptotic proteins and antioxidants, with the objective of restoring ER homeostatic balance. In this review, we will describe redox dependent activation (ER) and amplification (cytosol) loops that control the UPR and the consequences these regulatory loops have on cell fate and physiology. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据