4.6 Article

Refining the minimal sequence required for ERK1/2-dependent poly-ubiquitination and proteasome-dependent turnover of BIM

期刊

CELLULAR SIGNALLING
卷 22, 期 5, 页码 801-808

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2010.01.004

关键词

Apoptosis; BIM; ERK1/2; Proteasome; Ubiquitin

资金

  1. BBSRC [BB/E02162X/1]
  2. Babraham Institute
  3. BBSRC [BB/E02162X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/B/0000C199, BB/E02162X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The pro-apoptotic protein BIMEL is phosphorylated by ERK1/2 and this targets the protein for poly-ubiquitination and degradation by the proteasome as a survival mechanism. To define in greater detail the sequence determinants required for BIMEL turnover we have compared various BIM splice variants and truncation mutants. Of the naturally occurring splice variants BIM beta 1, which lacks the C-terminal hydrophobic domain, the BH3 domain and is cytosolic, exhibited the fastest turnover rate. Indeed, neither the C-terminus, the BH3 domain nor the DLC1 binding region was required for poly-ubiquitination and turnover of BIM. However, we demonstrate that a region consisting of the ERK1/2 docking domain, ERK1/2 phosphorylation sites and either of the two potential ubiquitin-acceptor lysine residues is sufficient to allow poly-ubiquitination and turnover of BIM. In the process we demonstrate that the C-terminal hydrophobic domain, previously suggested to be important in membrane localisation, is as important as the BH3 domain for BIM to induce cell death; similarly, the pro-death BH3-domain can also confer correct mitochondrial localisation in the absence of the C-terminus. These results refine the minimal sequence for ERK1/2-driven degradation and further define the functional importance of key regions within BIMEL, highlighting the complexity of this pro-apoptotic protein. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据