4.5 Article

Memory outcome after selective amygdalohippocampectomy: A study in 140 patients with temporal lobe epilepsy

期刊

EPILEPSIA
卷 43, 期 1, 页码 87-95

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING INC
DOI: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.2002.24101.x

关键词

selective amygdalohippocampectomyl; epilepsy; surgery; memory; outcome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The technique of selective amygdalohippocampectomy (SAH) was originally developed in epilepsy surgery to spare unaffected brain tissue from surgery, thus minimizing the cognitive consequences of temporal lobe surgery. The results of previous studies, however, are equivocal in this regard. This study evaluated memory after SAH in a large sample of patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Methods: The 140 patients received material-specific memory tests before and 3 months after unilateral SAH. Results: Significant declines in all aspects of verbal learning and memory were found particularly for the left resected group. With reliability-of-change indices, a high number of patients showed postoperative verbal memory declines, less than or equal to51% in left SAH and less than or equal to32% in right SAH. For left SAH, a higher preoperative verbal memory performance, a lower preoperative nonverbal memory score, an older age at surgery, and a later onset of epilepsy predicted a stronger decline in verbal memory. After right SAH,: the risk for a verbal memory decline was slightly increased when patients had surgical complications or a presurgical evaluation with bilateral intrahippocampal depth electrodes. Results concerning nonverbal memory were less clear. Conclusions: The results clearly indicate, that particularly left SAH can lead to a significant decline in memory functions. Predictors of postoperative verbal memory were similar to those reported for temporal lobectomy. Postoperative deteriorations were broader and stronger in our study than in previous studies. We discuss methodologic differences (sample size, retest interval, extent of resection) and other factors as possible reasons.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据