4.7 Article

Alternative end-joining in follicular lymphomas' t(14;18) translocation

期刊

LEUKEMIA
卷 16, 期 1, 页码 120-126

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402324

关键词

follicular lymphoma; secondary rearrangement; t(14;18) etiology; V(D)J recombination

向作者/读者索取更多资源

T(14;18) chromosomal translocation is assumed to result from illegitimate rearrangement between the BCL2 proto-oncogene and the IGH locus during the D-H to J(H) joining phase of V(D)J recombination in early B cells. Analysis of the breakpoint junctions suggests that translocation derives from the fusion between normal V(D)J recombination intermediates at the IGH locus and non-V(D)J-mediated broken-ends at the BCL2 locus. So far, BCL2 broken-ends have only been observed fused to coding-ends, raising questions concerning the molecular constraints of the illegitimate joining process. Using a combination of genome walking and long-range PCR assays, we describe in this report that in 4.5% (2/44) of the t(14;18), one of the BCL2 broken-ends is fused to a signal-end. The formation of these J(H)RSS/BCL2 junctions provides direct evidence that BCL2 broken-ends are capable of joining to both products of V(D)J recombination, suggesting their presence in the RAG-mediated post-cleavage complex. In addition, junctions generated by this alternative end-joining do not involve deletion of the chromosome 14 intervening sequences generally lost in the standard translocation, providing a unique opportunity to investigate the rearrangement status of this region in the translocated IGH allele. In both cases, a DJ(H) rearrangement could be detected 5' of the J(H)-RSS/BCL2 junction. These findings, together with the previously reported bias towards the most external D-H and J(H) segments in standard breakpoints, strongly suggest that t(14;18) preferentially occurs during an attempted secondary D-H to J(H) rearrangement. This unusual and restricted window of differentiation opens intriguing questions concerning the etiology of the translocation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据