4.6 Article

The combination of low dose of naloxone and morphine in PCA does not decrease opioid requirements in the postoperative period

期刊

PAIN
卷 96, 期 1-2, 页码 73-79

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00425-0

关键词

opioids; opioid antagonists; analgesia; gender differences; pain relief

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The continuous infusion of low doses of naloxone has been reported to decrease postoperative opioid requirements and opioid side effects, However, there is no study that evaluates the effectiveness of the combination of a low dose of naloxone and morphine using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). This prospective. randomized double-blind controlled study sought to determine if the combination of a low dose of naloxone and morphine in a PCA solution decreases postoperative opioid requirements and pain intensity. One hundred sixty-six patients (18-65 years old) undergoing operations of less than 3 h duration with an American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status I or IT were randomized to receive PCA morphine 1 mg/cc plus normal saline or PCA morphine I mg/cc plus naloxone 6 mug/cc. Initial PCA settings were 0.5 cc per demand with a lockout time of 10 min, The numbers of 2,5 cc supplemental rescue closes and the cumulative dose of each solution were recorded in the first 24 h after the surgical procedure. Pain intensity and opioid side effects were evaluated every 10 min in the postanesthesia care unit and every 4 It afterwards. Patient satisfaction was assessed at the end of the 24 h of observation. The morphine + naloxone group had more treatment failures (P 0.0001). higher opioid requirements (P = 0.0097). greater pain intensity (P = 0,04), less pain relief (P = 0.004). and less satisfaction (P = 0.01) than the morphine group. The incidence of side effects was similar in both groups (P = 0.3). Contrary to previous reports, adding low doses of naloxone to a morphine PCA solution increases opioid requirements and pain. (C) 2002 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier Science B.V, All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据