4.7 Article

Effectiveness of two quadruple, tetracycline- or clarithromycin-containing, second-line, Helicobacter pylori eradication therapies

期刊

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
卷 16, 期 3, 页码 569-575

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2002.01220.x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: There are no guidelines on second-line therapies for Helicobacter pylori eradication failures of omeprazole-clarithromycin-amoxicillin triple therapy. Aim: To compare the efficacy of two second-line therapies for persistent H. pylori infection. Methods: Over a 6-year period, patients with persistent H. pylori infection following omeprazole-clarithromycin-amoxicillin eradication therapy were randomized to receive omeprazole, 20 mg twice daily, bismuth, 120 mg four times daily, metronidazole, 500 mg twice daily, and either tetracycline, 500 mg four times daily, or clarithromycin, 500 mg twice daily, given for 7 days. Before therapy, patients underwent endoscopy with biopsies for histology, culture and antibiotic susceptibility tests. H. pylori infection was confirmed by histology. Results: Of the 95 randomized patients, 88 (93%,) completed the study. Age, sex, smoking, ulcer/non-ulcer dyspepsia ratio and antibiotic resistance were not significantly different between the treatment groups. On intention-to-treat analysis, eradication was achieved in 41 of the 49 patients (84%: 95% confidence interval, 70.4-92.79%) and 27 of the 46 patients (59%; 95%, confidence interval, 43.3-73.0%) of the tetracycline and clarithromycin-containing groups, respectively (P = 0.007). On multivariate regression analysis, the sensitivity of H. pylori to metronidazole had a likelihood ratio of 5.2 (P = 0.022), followed by the type of quadruple therapy (likelihood ratio, 4.4; P = 0.036). Conclusions: Tetracycline-containing quadruple rescue therapy is highly effective in treating H. pylori eradication failures of the omeprazole-amoxicillin-clarithromycin regimen.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据