4.7 Article

Accurate calculation of eye diagrams and bit error rates in optical transmission systems using linearization

期刊

JOURNAL OF LIGHTWAVE TECHNOLOGY
卷 20, 期 3, 页码 389-400

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/50.988987

关键词

amplifier noise; error analysis; Karhunen-Loeve transforms; linear approximation; Monte Carlo methods; nonlinearities; optical fiber dispersion; optical fiber theory; simulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a novel linearization method to calculate accurate eye diagrams and bit error rates (BERs) for arbitrary optical transmission systems and apply it to a dispersion-managed soliton (DMS) system. In this approach, we calculate the full nonlinear evolution using Monte Carlo methods. However, we analyze the data at the receiver assuming that the nonlinear interaction of the noise with itself in an appropriate basis set is negligible during transmission. Noise-noise beating due to the quadratic nonlinearity in the receiver is kept. We apply this approach to a highly nonlinear DMS system, which is a stringent test of our approach. In this case, we cannot simply use a Fourier basis to linearize, but we must first separate the phase and timing jitters. Once that is done, the remaining Fourier amplitudes of the noise obey a multivariate Gaussian distribution, the timing jitter is Gaussian distributed, and the phase jitter obeys a Jacobi-Theta distribution, which is the periodic analogue of a Gaussian distribution. We have carefully validated the linearization assumption through extensive Monte Carlo simulations. Once the effect of timing jitter is restored at the receiver, we calculate complete eye diagrams and the probability density functions for the marks and spaces. This new method is far more accurate than the currently accepted approach of simply fitting Gaussian curves to the distributions of the marks and spaces. In addition, we present a deterministic solution alternative to the Monte Carlo method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据