4.2 Article

4-Phenylbutyric Acid Increases GLUT4 Gene Expression through Suppression of HDAC5 but not Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress

期刊

CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 33, 期 6, 页码 1899-1910

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000362967

关键词

4-PBA; GLUT4; ER stress; HDAC5

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31271593, 31040054]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province [LC2012C07]
  3. Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment of Harbin Institute of Technology [ES201115]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background:The chemical chaperone 4-phenylbutyric acid (4-PBA) has been shown to relieve endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. Therefore, it improves insulin sensitivity and promotes glucose metabolism in skeletal muscle. Glucose transporter type 4 (GLUT4), as a major glucose transporter protein, plays a central role in glucose metabolism. Until now, it has been unclear whether 4-PBA affects GLUT4 gene expression and thus, contributes to glucose metabolism. Methods: C2C12 myotubes were treated with 4-PBA, tunicamycin or butyrate and subjected to Western blot and RT-PCR. Results: 4-PBA-treated C2C12 myotubes increased GLUT4 expression and promoted glucose metabolism. Most interestingly, GLUT4 gene expression induced by 4-PBA was not associated with ER stress even in the presence of tunicamycin, an ER stress inducer. Moreover, we also found that 4-PBA inhibited histonedeacetylase 5 (HDAC5) expression in C2C12 myotubes, resulting in hyperacetylation of the histone H3 at the myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF2) binding site. This increased the binding of MEF2A to the site on the GLUT4 promoter, resulting in increased GLUT4 expression. Conclusions: Our data indicate that 4-PBA increases GLUT4 expression by acetylating the MEF2 site to increase the MEF2A binding through a mechanism that involves suppression of the HDAC5 pathway, but without involving ER stress. Copyright (C) 2014 S Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据