4.2 Review

WNK3 is a Putative Chloride-sensing Kinase

期刊

CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 28, 期 6, 页码 1123-1134

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000335848

关键词

WNK; Salt transport; Hypertension; Epilepsy; Phosphatase

资金

  1. El Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACYT-Mexico) [83447, 165815]
  2. Leducq Foundation Transatlantic Network on Hypertension

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The with-no-lysine kinase 3 (WNK3) is a serine/threonine kinase that modulates the activity of the electroneutral cation-coupled chloride cotransporters (CCC). Using the Xenopus laevis oocyte heterologous expression system, it has been shown that WNK3 activates the Na+-coupled chloride cotransporters NKCC1, NKCC2, and NCC and inhibits the K+-coupled chloride cotransporters KCC1 through KCC4. Interestingly, the effect of catalytically inactive WNK3 is opposite to that of wild type WNK3: inactive WNK3 inhibits NKCCs and activates KCCs. In doing so, wild type and catalytically inactive WNK3 bypass the tonicity requirement for activation/inhibition of the cotransporter. Thus, WNK3 modulation of the electroneutral cotransporters promotes Cl-influx and prevents Cl-efflux, thus fitting the profile for a putative Cl--sensing kinase. Other kinases that potentially have these properties are the Ste20-type kinases, SPAK/OSR1, which become phosphorylated in response to reductions in intracellular chloride concentration and regulate the activity of NKCC1. It has been demonstrated that WNKs lie upstream of SPAK/OSR1 and that the activity of these kinases is activated by phosphorylation of threonines in the T-loop by WNKs. It is possible that a protein phosphatase is also involved in the WNK3 effects on its associated cotransporters because activation of KCCs and inhibition of NKCCs by inactive WNK3 can be prevented by known inhibitors of protein phosphatases, such as calyculin A and cyclosporine, suggesting that a protein phosphatase is also involved in the protein complex. Copyright (C) 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据