4.5 Article

Parent-offspring correlation estimate of heritability for early blight resistance in tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.

期刊

EUPHYTICA
卷 126, 期 2, 页码 291-297

出版社

KLUWER ACADEMIC PUBL
DOI: 10.1023/A:1016354626896

关键词

Alternaria solani; breeding; correlation; disease resistance; regression

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study estimated the heritability (h(2)) of early blight (EB) resistance in filial progeny of a cross between a susceptible ('NC84173'; mid-season maturity) and a resistant ('NC39E'; late-season maturity) tomato breeding lines. It addition, it examined the potential of identifying progeny with mid-season maturity and EB resistance. A total of 162 F-2 plants were grown under field conditions in 1998 and evaluated for disease symptoms three times during the season, and the area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) and final percent defoliation (disease severity) were determined. The F-2 plants were self-pollinated and F-3 seeds produced. The 162 F-3 progeny families, consisting of 20 plants per family, were grown in a replicated field trial in 1999 and evaluated for EB resistance (final percent defoliation) and plant maturity (days to 50% ripe fruit). The distributions of the final percent defoliation values in the F-2 and F-3 generations indicated that resistance from 'NC39E' was quantitative in nature. Estimates of h(2) for EB resistance, computed as the correlation coefficients between F-3 progeny family means and F-2 individual plant values, ranged from 0.65 to 0.71, indicating that EB resistance of 'NC39E' was heritable. Across F-3 families, a negative correlation (r = -0.46, p < 0.01) was observed between disease severity and earliness in maturity, indicating that plant maturity affected disease severity. However, several F-3 families were identified with considerable EB resistance and mid-season maturity, indicating that resistance from 'NC39E' might be useful for the development of commercially acceptable EB resistant tomato cultivars.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据