4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Energy expenditure and caloric balance after burn - Increased feeding leads to fat rather than lean mass accretion

期刊

ANNALS OF SURGERY
卷 235, 期 1, 页码 152-160

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200201000-00020

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [T32GM008256, P50GM060338, R01GM056687] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01-GM56687, P50-GM60338, T32-GM08256, R01 GM056687, P50 GM060338, T32 GM008256] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Resting energy expenditure (REE) is commonly measured in critical illness to determine caloric demands and thus nutritive needs. Summary Background Data: The purpose of this study was to 1) determine whether REE is associated with clinical outcomes and 2) determine whether an optimal caloric delivery rate based on REE exists to offset erosion of lean mass after burn, Methods: From 1995 to 2001, REE was measured by indirect calorimetry in 250 survivors of 10 to 99%TBSA bums. Caloric intake and REE were correlated with muscle protein catabolism, length of stay, ventilator dependence, sepsis, and mortality. From 1998 to 2000, 42 patients (>60%TBSA bums) received continuous enteral nutrition at a spectrum of caloric balance between 1.0x REE kcal/d -1.8x REE kcal/d. Serial body composition was measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, Lean mass, fat mass, morbidity, and mortality were determined, Results: REE/predicted basal metabolic rate correlated directly with burn size, sepsis, ventilator dependence, and muscle protein catabolism (P < .05). Declining REE correlated with mortality (P < .05). 2) Erosion of lean body mass was not attenuated by increased caloric balance, however, fat mass increased with caloric supply (P < .05). Conclusion: In surviving burned patients, caloric delivery beyond 1.2 x REE results in increased fat mass without changes in lean body mass. Declining energy expenditure appears to be a harbinger of mortality in severely burned patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据