4.2 Article

TGF beta-induced Early Activation of the Small GTPase RhoA is Smad2/3-independent and Involves Src and the Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor Vav2

期刊

CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 28, 期 2, 页码 229-238

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000331734

关键词

TGF beta; RhoA; Src; Vav2; Smad2/3

资金

  1. Greek Secretariat for Research and Technology [PENED03-688]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

TGF beta has been shown to induce short-and long-term actin reorganization controlled by Rho-GTPase signaling. A number of direct Smad target genes, rapidly activated by TGF beta, have been previously reported to control the long-term Rho activation and actin reorganization. However, the molecular mechanisms that regulate the prompt stimulation of Rho GTPases by TGF beta remain unknown. In the present study we report that TGF beta rapidly stimulated RhoA and RhoB activation in JEG3 choriocarcinoma cells that lack endogenous Smad3. Inhibition of Smad2 expression via siRNA-mediated silencing or by blocking its phosphorylation using the T beta RI inhibitor SB431542 did not prevent the early RhoA/B activation by TGF beta indicating that this effect is Smad2/3-independent. Pre-treatment of the cells with the general tyrosine kinase inhibitor Genistein blocked the TGF beta-induced early RhoA activation. In line with this finding, TGF beta-stimulation resulted in a quick activation of the non-receptor tyrosine kinase Src, followed by activation of the guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) Vav2. Inhibition of Src kinase by the selective inhibitor of the Src family tyrosine kinases PP2 totally blocked the early TGF beta-induced RhoA activation. Similarly, Vav2 silencing via siRNA reduced the TGF beta-induced RhoA activation implying that the rapid Src/Vav2 stimulation was effective in regulating RhoA activation. Our present findings provide for the first time a clear evidence for the role of Src and Vav2-GEF in the early Smad2/3-independent Rho activation by TGF beta. Copyright (C) 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据