4.6 Article

Th1 and Th2 cytokines exert regulatory effects upon islet microvascular areas in the NOD mouse

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 86, 期 4, 页码 651-664

出版社

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/jcb.10250

关键词

islet vessels; free radicals; IL-1 beta; IL-4; IL-10; eNOS; iNOS; adhesion molecules; NOD mouse

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we show that intra- and peri-islet microvascular areas undergo different changes during the islet inflammation in the nonobese diabetes-prone female mice. Actually, although the islet vascular area (IVA) considerably decreases while the infiltration progresses, at 15 weeks of age, the peri-islet vascular bed is unexpectedly and significantly increased. On the contrary, the intra-IVA is significantly decreased, due to vessel dilation. Later, by 2025 weeks of age, a decrease of both IVA occur, due to a significant islet 0 cell loss. Moreover, a dramatic fall of natural free radical scavenger values, which, in turn, exert an influence upon vessels, is observed. These effects are completely counteracted by the administration of IL-4, a Th2 protective cytokine; IL-10, another putative Th2 cytokine, exerts direct effects upon endothelial cell (EC) function, as shown by the increase of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) mRNA transcripts and by the release of endothelial NO which, in turn, exert vasodilatory effects; moreover, this cytokine significantly upregulates adhesion molecules on endothelia. On the other hand, IL-1beta, a Th1 proinflammatory cytokine, dramatically increases nitrite and nitrate levels, as well as inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) transcripts and also upregulates islet ICAM-1 expression as well as circulating ICAM-1 levels. Taken together, our findings clearly show that cytokines and islet endothelia are directly involved in the pathophysiology of the disease. Their reciprocal influence gives new insight to understand the role of microvasculature during islet P cell attack. (C) 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据