4.6 Article

Impact of pain on self-rated health in the community-dwelling older adults

期刊

PAIN
卷 95, 期 1-2, 页码 75-82

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00375-X

关键词

pain; self-rated health; older adults; health survey; community-dwelling

资金

  1. AGENCY FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH AND QUALITY [R03HS009820] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. AHRQ HHS [R03 HS 09820-01] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the impact of pain on self-rated health status in the community-dwelling older adults using the 1993 public release data of the Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old (AHEAD). AHEAD is a population-based household survey designed to examine the dynamic interactions between health, family, and economic variables among US older adults. Results showed that 33% of the older adults reported frequent pain and 20% reported significant pain resulting in activity limitation. Controlling for clinical health status, socio-demographic characteristics, and access to medical care, logistic regression analyses showed that those who often have pain were more than twice as likely (odds ratio (OR) = 2.63; confidence interval (CI) = 2.35, 2.95; P = <0.0001) to perceive their health status to be 'poor'. Other predictors (P < 0.01) include functional impairment (OR = 2.78), chronic diseases (OR = 1.89), minority status (OR = 1.88), education (OR = 1.77), and physician visits (OR = 1.64). This study documents the adverse impact of pain on self-rated health as well as the fact that the experience of pain and poor subjective health and well-being is greatest among the most socially disadvantaged older adults (minorities and those with the least education). The findings suggest that treating and controlling pain may significantly enhance the subjective health and well-being of community-dwelling older adults. (C) 2002 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据