4.6 Article

Cortisol regulates the expression of Notch in osteoblasts

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 85, 期 2, 页码 252-258

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcb.10125

关键词

glucocorticoids; cell differentiation; signaling; receptors; jagged

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES [R37AR021707, R01AR021707] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK045227] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR21707] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK45227] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glucocorticoids have important effects on osteoblastic replication, differentiation, and function, and the Notch family of receptors is considered to play a role in osteoblastic cell differentiation. We postulated that cortisol could regulate Notch and Notch ligand expression in osteoblastic cells, providing an additional mechanism by which glucocorticoids could regulate osteoblastic differentiation. We examined the expression and regulation of Notch1, 2, 3, and 4 and their ligands lagged I and 2 and Delta I and 3 by cortisol in cultures of osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. Cortisol caused a time-dependent increase in Notch1 and 2 mRNA levels in MC3T3 cells. Notch3 and 4 were not detected in the presence or absence of cortisol. MC3T3 cells expressed Delta 1 and lagged 1 but not Jagged 2 or Delta 3 mRNAs, and cortisol did not have a substantial effect on the expression of any of these ligands. Cortisol increased the rate of Notch1 and 2 transcription and, in transcriptionally arrested cells, did not modify the decay of the transcripts, indicating a transcriptional level of control. In conclusion, cortisol stimulates Notch1 and 2 transcription in osteoblasts. Since Notch signaling appears to play a negative role in osteoblastic differentiation, its increased expression could be relevant to the actions of cortisol in bone. J. Cell. Biochem. 85: 252-258, 2002. (C) 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据