4.5 Article

Host carbon sources modulate cell wall architecture, drug resistance and virulence in a fungal pathogen

期刊

CELLULAR MICROBIOLOGY
卷 14, 期 9, 页码 1319-1335

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2012.01813.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Commission (FINSysB) [PITN-GA-2008-214004]
  2. UK Biotechnology and Biological Research Council [BB/F00513X/1]
  3. Wellcome Trust [080088]
  4. European Commission (STRIFE) [ERC-2009-AdG-249793]
  5. BBSRC [BB/F00513X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/B/06679, BB/F00513X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The survival of all microbes depends upon their ability to respond to environmental challenges. To establish infection, pathogens such as Candida albicans must mount effective stress responses to counter host defences while adapting to dynamic changes in nutrient status within host niches. Studies of C.?albicans stress adaptation have generally been performed on glucose-grown cells, leaving the effects of alternative carbon sources upon stress resistance largely unexplored. We have shown that growth on alternative carbon sources, such as lactate, strongly influence the resistance of C.?albicans to antifungal drugs, osmotic and cell wall stresses. Similar trends were observed in clinical isolates and other pathogenic Candida species. The increased stress resistance of C.?albicans was not dependent on key stress (Hog1) and cell integrity (Mkc1) signalling pathways. Instead, increased stress resistance was promoted by major changes in the architecture and biophysical properties of the cell wall. Glucose- and lactate-grown cells displayed significant differences in cell wall mass, ultrastructure, elasticity and adhesion. Changes in carbon source also altered the virulence of C.?albicans in models of systemic candidiasis and vaginitis, confirming the importance of alternative carbon sources within host niches during C.?albicans infections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据