4.5 Article

The small GTPases Rab9A and Rab23 function at distinct steps in autophagy during Group A Streptococcus infection

期刊

CELLULAR MICROBIOLOGY
卷 14, 期 8, 页码 1149-1165

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2012.01792.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japanese Ministry of Education, Global Center of Excellence (GCOE) Program
  2. International Research Center for Molecular Science in Tooth and Bone Diseases
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [LS041]
  4. [21390487]
  5. [22592032]
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23390103, 10J00628] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Autophagy mediates the degradation of cytoplasmic contents in the lysosome and plays a significant role in immunity. Here we identified the small GTPases Rab9A and Rab23 as novel autophagy regulators during Group A streptococcus (GAS) infection. Rab9A was recruited to GAS-containing autophagosome-like vacuoles (GcAVs) after autophagosomal maturation and its activity was required for GcAV enlargement and eventual lysosomal fusion. GcAV enlargement appeared to be related to homotypic fusion of GcAVs with Rab9A. Rab23 was recruited to GAS-capturing forming autophagosomes. Knockdown of Rab23 expression decreased both LC3- and Atg5-positive GAS formation and caused the accumulation of LC3-positive structures that did not associate with intracellular GAS. It was suggested, therefore, that Rab23 is required for GcAV formation and is involved in GAS targeting of autophagic vacuoles. Furthermore, knockdown of Rab9A or Rab23 expression impaired the degradation of intracellular GAS. Therefore, our data reveal that the Rab9A and Rab23 GTPases play crucial roles in autophagy of GAS. However, neither Rab9A nor Rab23 were localized to starvation-induced autophagosomes. Not only Rab9A but also Rab23 was dispensable for starvation-induced autophagosome formation. These findings demonstrate that specific Rab proteins function at distinct steps during autophagy in response to GAS infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据