4.5 Article

Pseudomonas aeruginosa Psl polysaccharide reduces neutrophil phagocytosis and the oxidative response by limiting complement-mediated opsonization

期刊

CELLULAR MICROBIOLOGY
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 95-106

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2011.01704.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Public Health Service [AI061396, HL058334]
  2. WFUHS
  3. CFF [MISHRA11F0]
  4. NRSA [AI07870002]
  5. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL058334] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R56AI061396, R01AI097511, R21AI113462, R21AI061396, R01AI061396] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pseudomonas aeruginosa causes chronic lung infections in the airways of cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. Psl is an extracellular polysaccharide expressed by non-mucoid P. aeruginosa strains, which are believed to be initial colonizers. We hypothesized that Psl protects P. aeruginosa from host defences within the CF lung prior to their conversion to the mucoid phenotype. We discovered that serum opsonization significantly increased the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by neutrophils exposed to a psl-deficient mutant, compared with wild-type (WT) and Psl overexpressing strains (Psl++). Psl-deficient P. aeruginosa were internalized and killed by neutrophils and macrophages more efficiently than WT and Psl++ variants. Deposition of complement components C3, C5 and C7 was significantly higher on psl-deficient strains compared with WT and Psl++ bacteria. In an in vivo pulmonary competition assay, there was a 4.5-fold fitness advantage for WT over psl-deficient P. aeruginosa. Together, these data show that Psl inhibits efficient opsonization, resulting in reduced neutrophil ROS production, and decreased killing by phagocytes. This provides a survival advantage in vivo. Since phagocytes are critical in early recognition and control of infection, therapies aimed at Psl could improve the quality of life for patients colonized with P. aeruginosa.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据