4.7 Article

5-HT2A and 5-HT2C/2B receptor subtypes modulate dopamine release induced in vivo by amphetamine and morphine in both the rat nucleus accumbens and striatum

期刊

NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 26, 期 3, 页码 311-324

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1016/S0893-133X(01)00333-5

关键词

microdialysis; dopamine release; dopaminergic neuron firing rate; 5-HT2A receptors; 5-HT2C/2B receptors; amphetamine; morphine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In vivo microdialysis and single-cell extracellular recordings were used to assess the involvement of serotonin(2A) (5-HT2A) and serotonin(2C/2B) (5-HT2C/2B) receptors in the effects induced by amphetamine and morphine on dopaminergic (DA) activity within the mesoaccumbal and nigrostriatal pathways. The increase in DA release induced by amphetamine (2 mg/kg i.p.) in the nucleus accumbens and striatum was significantly reduced by the selective 5-HT2A antagonist SR 46349B (0.5 mg/kg s.c.), but not affected by the 5-HT2C/2B antagonist SB 206553 (5 mg/kg i.p.). In contrast, the enhancement of accumbal and striatal DA output induced by morphine (2.5 mg/kg s.c.), while insensitive to SR 4634913, was significantly increased by SB 206553. Furthermore, morphine (0.1-10 mg/kg i.v.)-induced increase in DA neuron firing rate in both the ventral tegmental area and the substantia nigra pars compacta was unaffected by SR 46349B (0.1 mg/kg i.v.) but significantly potentiated by SB 206553 (0.1 mg/kg i.v.). These results show that 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors regulate specifically the activation of midbrain DA neurons induced by amphetamine and morphine, respectively. This differential contribution may be related to the specific mechanism of action of the drug considered and to the neuronal circuitry involved in their effect on DA neurons. Furthermore, these results suggest that 5-HT2C receptors selectively modulate the impulse flow-dependent release of DA. (C) 2002 American College of Neuropsychopharmacology. Published by Elsevier Science Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据