4.5 Article

Perturbation of vacuolar maturation promotes listeriolysin O-independent vacuolar escape during Listeria monocytogenes infection of human cells

期刊

CELLULAR MICROBIOLOGY
卷 11, 期 9, 页码 1382-1398

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01338.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Public Health Service [AI-053669, AI-056446]
  2. National Institutes of Health [AG-011085]
  3. Howard Hughes Medical Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P>Listeria monocytogenes is a bacterial pathogen that replicates within the cytosol of infected host cells. The ability to rapidly escape the phagocytic vacuole is essential for efficient intracellular replication. In the murine model of infection, the pore-forming cytolysin listeriolysin O (LLO) is absolutely required for vacuolar dissolution, as LLO-deficient (Delta LLO) mutants remain trapped within vacuoles. In contrast, in many human cell types Delta LLO L. monocytogenes are capable of vacuolar escape at moderate to high frequencies. To better characterize the mechanism of LLO-independent vacuolar escape in human cells, we conducted an RNA interference screen to identify vesicular trafficking factors that play a role in altering vacuolar escape efficiency of Delta LLO L. monocytogenes. RNA interference knockdown of 18 vesicular trafficking factors resulted in increased LLO-independent vacuolar escape. Our results suggest that knockdown of one factor, RABEP1 (rabaptin-5), decreased the maturation of vacuoles containing Delta LLO L. monocytogenes. Thus, we provide evidence that increased vacuolar escape of Delta LLO L. monocytogenes in human cells correlates with slower vacuolar maturation. We also determined that increased LLO-independent dissolution of vacuoles during RABEP1 knockdown required the bacterial broad-range phospholipase C (PC-PLC). We hypothesize that slowing the kinetics of vacuolar maturation generates an environment conducive for vacuolar escape mediated by the bacterial phospholipases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据