4.4 Article

Tetrahydrobiopterin improves impaired endothelium-dependent forearm vasodilation in patients with heart failure

期刊

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY
卷 39, 期 3, 页码 363-368

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00005344-200203000-00007

关键词

endothelium; forearm blood flow; heart failure; nitric oxide; tetrahydrobiopterin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Endothelium-dependent vasodilation is impaired in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). However, the mechanisms responsible for this effect are not fully understood. The vasodilator response to acetylcholine (ACh) has been used to examine the endothelium-dependent vasodilation in humans and is known to be mediated by nitric oxide (NO). The impaired production of NO or an increase in its degradation is thought to be responsible for the endothelial dysfunction in CHF. The aim of this study was to determine whether the decrease in availability of tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4), an essential cofactor of NO synthase, contributes to the impairment of endothelium-dependent vasodilation in patients with CHF. Fourteen patients with CHF (New York Heart Association functional class II-IV, age: 59 +/- 4 years, ejection fraction: 28 +/- 3%) and seven age-matched control subjects were examined. Forearm blood flow (FBF) was measured by plethysmography during an intra-arterial infusion of a graded dose of ACh (4, 8, and 16 mug/min) and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) (0.8, 1.6, and 3.2 mug/min). These procedures were repeated during a co-infusion of BH4 (400 mug/min). The forearm vasodilator response to ACh was significantly enhanced during co-infusion of BH4 in patients with CHF, whereas no effect was observed in healthy subjects. In contrast, the response to SNP was not affected by BH4 in either group. The administration of BH4 did not alter the baseline FBF in either group. These results suggest that an acute administration of BH4 improves endothelium-dependent forearm vasodilation in patients with CHF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据